Thursday, 14 November 2013
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:02 PMChaos, piled atop incompetence.
...
Subject: The President’s Announcement
Importance: High
These are fun times, don’t you think?
The statement the President made to the press today has put a few thing on hold. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303789604579197733759439274
As of right now I would advise we do nothing in terms of advice or enrolling in either a Qualified Health Insurance (metallic) plan or a non-grandfathered plan. That would include AffordaBlue PLUS. Frankly we don’t know the full implications of what the president has said. We are certain the ND Department of Insurance will also have something to add to the conversation. So simply put, I don’t know what to advise anyone seeking health insurance as of this minute.
I will send out an update tomorrow to bring everyone up to speed on BCBSND’s position.
STAY TUNED, more to come tomorrow.
Thanks,
JD (Jim) Nichol
Consumer Sales Manager
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH DAKOTA
(Via: Ace)
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
22:47:50 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 2 kb.
John McCain Thinks John Kerry Is a ‘Human Wrecking Ball’(...of course McCain also had time to bash Ted Cruz.)
Hey, maybe they could get married and run away together... Just think! Then we’d be rid of both of them!
(Via: Insty)
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
18:24:51 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
Erik offers a suggestion to congress:
Every [IRS scandal] hearing should start out with statements and questions along the following lines:Well, Erik is a Frenchman. It’s understandable that he might mistake the Republicans for a genuine opposition, and not understand their status as the currently-out-of-power segment of the Permanent Bipartisan Fusion Party.Now, Mrs. Lerner/Mr. Lew (or whoever is being questioned), you — obviously — realize that the whole background to this scandal is the improper politicization of the Internal Revenue Service, do you not? Good. And you realize that what occurred was a blatant display of double standards, do you not? Very well. And you recognize that the process was unfair and inappropriate, don’t you, and that there was no reason to keep Such-and-Such-a Tea Party waiting for months, indeed for years? Good.
So: there do not seem to be any disagreements about that…
And so I have the following question for you:
Why is it that Such-and-Such-a Tea Party has not yet indeed received approval of its tax-exempt status?
Why is it that — six months later after the scandal broke — its members are still waiting to receive approval of their status?
A real opposition might be after some real answers. The Permanent Party, not so much.
IOW, fat chance.
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
17:58:23 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 3 kb.
Wednesday, 13 November 2013
(Via: Steyn via Blair via Mætenloch)
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Clipfile
at
18:55:56 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 2 kb.
Tuesday, 12 November 2013
First snow of the season...

Posted by: Old Grouch in
Dear Diary...
at
19:06:05 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Saturday, 09 November 2013
I don’t want an apology from Obama. I want an apology from every shit-for-brains reporter who blindly bought his fantasies.That’s assuming they ‘‘blindly bought’’ them...
Previously: Propagandists First
Posted by: Old Grouch in
The Press
at
17:16:36 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
Thursday, 07 November 2013
Francis Fukuyama finds our federal bureaucracy wanting:
I find it amazing how far much of the US federal bureaucracy has fallen from the standard of a professional, impersonal, merit-based Weberian organization since the first efforts to do this were made under the 1883 Pendleton Act. For example, in recent years fully half of all new entrants into the federal civil service have been veterans, and of these, a large number are disabled veterans. There is nothing wrong with hiring disabled veterans, but this Congressionally-mandated veterans preference was not designed with the aim of producing the highest possible quality government. It is akin to the mandates imposed on federal procurement for small-, women-owned, or minority business contracting...(We interrupt this quotation to remove two sentences. Reason why, below.
Meanwhile, continuing...)
Recruitment and promotion tend to value experience over capacity, and therefore reinforce a status-quo bias among federal employees. What we end up with is a screwed-up set of incentives for federal workers that does not reward innovation, risk-taking, or high levels of qualification.Problem stated. And now, his solution, in those two sentences:
What the contemporary civil service fails to do is to attract smart, highly qualified young people out of elite universities in the manner of the classic French, German, or British services. In fact, the government is very good at putting a large number of obstacles in front of any ambitious young person who might want to sign up, like voluminous disclosure rules in the current employment regulations.So: One of our public intellectuals wants to fix failure in government by replacing the bureaucracy’s protected-class incompetents with ‘‘elite university’’ mandarins. (You know, like in France!)
How... unsurprising.
Via: Glenn Reynolds, who notes:
...The fact [is] that the civil service has been colonized by a single political party, and that career officials who are supposed to be nonpartisan have been acting as partisan political operatives... I don’t think that Fukuyama’s proposed reforms would do anything about this problem.Indeed. More likely exacerbate it.
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Rants
at
18:04:52 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 330 words, total size 3 kb.
Tuesday, 29 October 2013
If everyone in Wonkland knew that ‘‘you can keep your own medical plan’’ wasn’t true, why didn’t ‘‘anyone in Wonkland’’ challenge it?
Goldberg:
...What does it say about the liberal wonks that they either never said so when the legislation was being debated or said so very quietly under their breaths?Maybe that they’re a pack of partisan liars?
Related:
MORE (131031, 17:32): *Now* They Tell Us Dept
Posted by: Old Grouch in
The Press
at
21:51:39 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 3 kb.
Monday, 28 October 2013
Instapundit spots a headline:
The performance of the Republican leadership has eliminated the party as a serious threat to anything, excepting liberty and taxpayers’ pocketbooks.
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
17:07:28 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Saturday, 26 October 2013
On Friday... the man the president brought in to rescue his health insurance program acknowledged the painfully obvious: that the problems have been far worse than we were told. Jeffrey Zeints said they’ll take weeks — if not longer — to fix. Plus, he’s shaking up the team overseeing the repair.
...
‘‘And by the end of November, healthcare.gov will work smoothly for the vast majority of users.’’
(Via: Insty.)
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
17:11:19 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
53 queries taking 0.1702 seconds, 226 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.













